Buy on Amazon
€177.74
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700F is 1213 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Performs up to 220% better in League of Legends than Celeron G3930T - 195 vs 61 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 16 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Up to 82% cheaper than Core i7-10700F - $28.52 vs $160.13
- Up to 43% better value when playing League of Legends than Core i7-10700F - $0.52 vs $0.91 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700F doesn't have integrated graphics
League of Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Core i7-10700F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
195
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.91/FPS
57%
Price, €
€177.74
17%
FPS Winner
Intel® Core™ i7-10700F Desktop Processor 8 Cores up to 4.8 GHz Without Processor Graphics LGA1200 (Intel® 400 Series chipset) 65W
Buy for €177.74 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 128 minutes ago
Celeron G3930T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
61
31%
Value, €/FPS
€0.52/FPS
100%
Price, €
€31.66
100%
Value Winner
Intel Celeron G3930T Dual-core (2 Core) 2.7GHz Processor Socket H4 LGA-1151 OEM Pack-Tray Packaging Model CM8067703016211
Buy for €31.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 127 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Core i7-10700F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Celeron G3930T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-10700F | vs | Intel Celeron G3930T |
|---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 2 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
| 4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 65 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.