Buy on Amazon
€163.94
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
No items available
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7940HS outperforms Core i7-10700F on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7940HS is 1001 days newer than Core i7-10700F.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
- Performs up to 13% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i7-10700F - 152 vs 135 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Core i7-10700F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
135
88.81578947368422%
Value, €/FPS
€1.21/FPS
100%
Price, €
€163.94
100%
Value Winner
Intel® Core™ i7-10700F Desktop Processor 8 Cores up to 4.8 GHz Without Processor Graphics LGA1200 (Intel® 400 Series chipset) 65W
Buy for €163.94 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 57262 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Core i7-10700F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Ryzen 9 7940HS
Mobile • Jan 26th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-10700F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Single-Core
1612
65.26315789473685%
Multi-Core
7231
62.196800275245145%
Intel Core i7-10700F | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 26th, 2023 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Not Available |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket FP8 |
Desktop | Segment | Mobile |
| 8 | Cores | 8 |
| 16 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
| 4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
| 65 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 4 nm |
| 29.0x | Multiplier | 40.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon 780M |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.