Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 7 2700 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 7 2700 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700F is 742 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 7 2700.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Performs up to 9% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Ryzen 7 2700 - 111 vs 102 FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 2700
- Up to 13% cheaper than Core i7-10700F - $135.27 vs $155.0
- Up to 5% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i7-10700F - $1.47 vs $1.55 per FPS
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
111
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.55/FPS
94%
Price, €
€172.05
87%
FPS Winner
Buy for €172.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 187 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
102
91%
Value, €/FPS
€1.47/FPS
100%
Price, €
€150.15
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €150.15 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 188 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-10700F | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 2700 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 16 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |