Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 2400G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 2400G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700F is 808 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 2400G.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Performs up to 5% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Ryzen 5 2400G - 170 vs 162 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 2400G - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
- Up to 40% cheaper than Core i7-10700F - $98.71 vs $163.78
- Up to 36% better value when playing The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i7-10700F - $0.68 vs $1.07 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700F doesn't have integrated graphics
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
170
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.07/FPS
63%
Price, €
€181.8
60%
FPS Winner
Buy for €181.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11369 minutes ago
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
FPS
162
95%
Value, €/FPS
€0.68/FPS
100%
Price, €
€109.57
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €109.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11366 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-10700F | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2400G |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Feb 12th, 2018 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raven Ridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon RX Vega 11 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |