Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 3 2200G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 3 2200G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700F is 808 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 3 2200G.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Performs up to 9% better in Sea of Thieves than Ryzen 3 2200G - 242 vs 222 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 2200G - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 2200G
- Up to 41% cheaper than Core i7-10700F - $95.05 vs $160.13
- Up to 34% better value when playing Sea of Thieves than Core i7-10700F - $0.48 vs $0.73 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Sea of Thieves
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
242
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.73/FPS
65%
Price, €
€177.74
59%
FPS Winner
Buy for €177.74 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 148 minutes ago
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
FPS
222
91%
Value, €/FPS
€0.48/FPS
100%
Price, €
€105.51
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €105.51 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 149 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-10700F | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 2200G |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Feb 12th, 2018 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raven Ridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |