Buy on Amazon
€172.05
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $132
Availability
MSRP in USD: $132
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700F outperforms the cheaper FX-6300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700F is 2746 days newer than the cheaper FX-6300.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Performs up to 2% better in Control than FX-6300 - 203 vs 199 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-6300 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6300 - 16 vs 6 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Up to 65% cheaper than Core i7-10700F - $54.12 vs $155.0
- Up to 65% better value when playing Control than Core i7-10700F - $0.3 vs $0.85 per FPS
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Core i7-10700F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
203
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.85/FPS
35%
Price, €
€172.05
34%
FPS Winner
Intel® Core™ i7-10700F Desktop Processor 8 Cores up to 4.8 GHz Without Processor Graphics LGA1200 (Intel® 400 Series chipset) 65W
Buy for €172.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 141 minutes ago
AMD OEM FX-6300 Vishera Six-Core Black Edition AM3+ 3.5Ghz Desktop CPU Processor
Buy for €60.07 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 141 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Core i7-10700F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FX-6300
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-10700F | vs | AMD FX-6300 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
| Core i7 | Collection | FX |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Vishera |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 6 |
| 2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.