Buy on Amazon
€30.03
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700 outperforms Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-10700 is 2705 days newer than Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700
- Performs up to 42% better in Starfield than Celeron G1610 - 61 vs 43 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 16 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700 - 55 vs 65 Watts
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
43
70.49180327868852%
Value, €/FPS
€0.7/FPS
100%
Price, €
€30.03
100%
Value Winner
Intel Celeron G1610 2.60GHz LGA 1155 Processor BX80637G1610
Buy for €30.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 127 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-10700
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
426
26.944971537001898%
Multi-Core
739
10.542082738944366%
Intel Core i7-10700 | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 2 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
| 4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 65 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
| UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.