Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9600KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-10400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-10400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-9600KF is 478 days older than the cheaper Core i5-10400.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9600KF
- Performs up to 1% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i5-10400 - 160 vs 159 FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400
- Up to 31% cheaper than Core i5-9600KF - $91.04 vs $131.7
- Up to 30% better value when playing Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i5-9600KF - $0.64 vs $0.91 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i5-9600KF - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9600KF - 12 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-9600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
160
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.91/FPS
70%
Price, €
€146.19
69%
FPS Winner
Buy for €146.19 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13068 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
159
99%
Value, €/FPS
€0.64/FPS
100%
Price, €
€101.05
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €101.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13068 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-9600KF | vs | Intel Core i5-10400 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
6 | Threads | 12 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |