Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-9600KF outperforms the more expensive Core i3-10300 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-9600KF is 478 days older than the more expensive Core i3-10300.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9600KF
- Performs up to 1% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i3-10300 - 179 vs 178 FPS
- Up to 67% cheaper than Core i3-10300 - $109.68 vs $335.61
- Up to 67% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i3-10300 - $0.68 vs $2.09 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10300
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i5-9600KF - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9600KF - 8 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-9600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
179
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.68/FPS
100%
Price, €
€121.75
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €121.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 88 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
178
99.4413407821229%
Value, €/FPS
€2.09/FPS
32.535885167464116%
Price, €
€372.53
32%
Buy for €372.53 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 89 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Single-Core
1565
98.6137366099559%
Multi-Core
4795
84.01962502190293%
Intel Core i5-9600KF | vs | Intel Core i3-10300 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
6 | Threads | 8 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |