Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9600KF outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10105T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10105T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-9600KF is 798 days older than the cheaper Core i3-10105T.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9600KF
- Performs up to 2% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i3-10105T - 177 vs 173 FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105T
- Up to 50% cheaper than Core i5-9600KF - $65.8 vs $131.7
- Up to 49% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i5-9600KF - $0.42 vs $0.83 per FPS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than Intel Core i5-9600KF - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9600KF - 8 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-9600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
177
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.83/FPS
50%
Price, €
€146.19
49%
FPS Winner
Buy for €146.19 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 49 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
173
97%
Value, €/FPS
€0.42/FPS
100%
Price, €
€73.04
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €73.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 47 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-9600KF | vs | Intel Core i3-10105T |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
6 | Threads | 8 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |