Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9600KF outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10105 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10105 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-9600KF is 798 days older than the cheaper Core i3-10105.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9600KF
- Performs up to 2% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i3-10105 - 110 vs 108 FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105
- Up to 50% cheaper than Core i5-9600KF - $65.77 vs $131.7
- Up to 49% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i5-9600KF - $0.68 vs $1.33 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i5-9600KF - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9600KF - 8 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-9600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
110
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.33/FPS
51%
Price, €
€146.19
49%
FPS Winner
Buy for €146.19 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 123 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
108
98%
Value, €/FPS
€0.68/FPS
100%
Price, €
€73.01
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €73.01 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 122 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-9600KF | vs | Intel Core i3-10105 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
6 | Threads | 8 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |