Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9600KF outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 3 2200G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 3 2200G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-9600KF is 330 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 3 2200G.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9600KF
- Performs up to 22% better in War Thunder than Ryzen 3 2200G - 191 vs 157 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 2200G - 6 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 2200G
- Up to 28% cheaper than Core i5-9600KF - $95.05 vs $131.7
- Up to 13% better value when playing War Thunder than Core i5-9600KF - $0.67 vs $0.77 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i5-9600KF - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-9600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
191
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.77/FPS
87%
Price, €
€146.19
72%
FPS Winner
Buy for €146.19 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 37 minutes ago
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
FPS
157
82%
Value, €/FPS
€0.67/FPS
100%
Price, €
€105.51
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €105.51 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 38 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-9600KF | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 2200G |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Feb 12th, 2018 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Raven Ridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
6 | Threads | 4 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |