Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9600KF outperforms the cheaper FX-8320 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-9600KF is 2268 days newer than the cheaper FX-8320.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9600KF
- Performs up to 7% better in Valheim than FX-8320 - 204 vs 190 FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-8320 - 95 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of AMD FX-8320
- Up to 37% cheaper than Core i5-9600KF - $69.47 vs $109.68
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9600KF - 8 vs 6 threads
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for €121.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 143 minutes ago
Buy for €77.11 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 139 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-9600KF | vs | AMD FX-8320 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
6 | Threads | 8 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |