Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-9600K outperforms the more expensive Core i7-3820 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-9600K is 2440 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-3820.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9600K
- Performs up to 17% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i7-3820 - 137 vs 117 FPS
- Up to 57% cheaper than Core i7-3820 - $99.44 vs $233.89
- Up to 64% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i7-3820 - $0.81 vs $2.22 per FPS
- Consumes up to 27% less energy than Intel Core i7-3820 - 95 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-3820 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3820
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9600K - 8 vs 6 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
137
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.81/FPS
100%
Price, €
€110.38
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €110.38 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58 minutes ago
Buy for €259.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 57 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-9600K | vs | Intel Core i7-3820 |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Feb 13th, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge E |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
6 | Threads | 8 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 130 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
UHD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |