Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9600K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-9600K is 1144 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9600K
- Performs up to 58% better in Assassin's Creed Mirage than Celeron G3900 - 112 vs 71 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 6 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 72% cheaper than Core i5-9600K - $29.18 vs $106.02
- Up to 56% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Mirage than Core i5-9600K - $0.46 vs $1.05 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i5-9600K - 51 vs 95 Watts
Assassin's Creed Mirage
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
112
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.05/FPS
43%
Price, €
€117.68
27%
FPS Winner
Buy for €117.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2087 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
71
63%
Value, €/FPS
€0.46/FPS
100%
Price, €
€32.39
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €32.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2086 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-9600K | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
6 | Threads | 2 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 51 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
UHD 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |