Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-9500 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-9500 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 1538 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-9500.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9500
- Up to 76% cheaper than Core i9-13900F - $73.11 vs $307.09
- Up to 74% better value when playing Mass Effect: Andromeda than Core i9-13900F - $0.37 vs $1.4 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 12% better in Mass Effect: Andromeda than Core i5-9500 - 243 vs 217 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9500 - 32 vs 6 threads
Mass Effect: Andromeda
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
217
89.30041152263375%
Value, €/FPS
€0.37/FPS
100%
Price, €
€81.15
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €81.15 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
243
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.4/FPS
26.42857142857143%
Price, €
€340.87
23%
FPS Winner
Buy for €340.87 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Single-Core
1468
53.772893772893774%
Multi-Core
4990
28.97961554097218%
Intel Core i5-9500 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900F |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 24 |
6 | Threads | 32 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
UHD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |