Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-9400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-9400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900K is 478 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-9400F.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Up to 83% cheaper than Core i9-10900K - $58.5 vs $343.62
- Up to 81% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Core i9-10900K - $0.52 vs $2.78 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900K
- Performs up to 5% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Core i5-9400F - 137 vs 131 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9400F - 20 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-9400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
131
95.62043795620438%
Value, €/FPS
€0.52/FPS
100%
Price, €
€64.93
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €64.93 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 166 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
137
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.78/FPS
18.705035971223026%
Price, €
€381.42
17%
FPS Winner
Buy for €381.42 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 166 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Single-Core
1378
78.78787878787878%
Multi-Core
4834
52.75564771363091%
Intel Core i5-9400F | vs | Intel Core i9-10900K |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 10 |
6 | Threads | 20 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |