Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9400F outperforms Core i7-7700HQ on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-9400F is 735 days newer than Core i7-7700HQ.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Performs up to 4% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i7-7700HQ - 174 vs 168 FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-7700HQ
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Core i5-9400F - 45 vs 65 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9400F - 8 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-9400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
174
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.45/FPS
100%
Price, €
€77.92
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €77.92 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3289 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-9400F | vs | Intel Core i7-7700HQ |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel BGA 1440 |
Desktop | Segment | Mobile |
6 | Cores | 4 |
6 | Threads | 8 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 45 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |