Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-9400F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-4930K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-9400F is 1955 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-4930K.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Performs up to 37% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Core i7-4930K - 360 vs 263 FPS
- Up to 18% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Core i7-4930K - $0.23 vs $0.28 per FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Core i7-4930K - 65 vs 130 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4930K
- Up to 12% cheaper than Core i5-9400F - $65.77 vs $74.42
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9400F - 12 vs 6 threads
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
360
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.23/FPS
100%
Price, €
€82.61
88%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €82.61 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 69 minutes ago
Buy for €73.01 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 68 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-9400F | vs | Intel Core i7-4930K |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2013 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge E |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
6 | Threads | 12 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 130 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |