Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9600 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-9400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-9400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-9600 is 81 days older than the cheaper Core i5-9400F.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Up to 51% cheaper than Core i5-9600 - $70.2 vs $142.59
- Up to 51% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-9600 - $0.59 vs $1.2 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9600
- Performs up to 1% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-9400F - 132 vs 131 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-9400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
131
99%
Value, €/FPS
€0.59/FPS
100%
Price, €
€77.92
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €77.92 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5627 minutes ago
Buy for €158.27 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5627 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-9400F | vs | Intel Core i5-9600 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
6 | Threads | 6 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |