Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9400F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-7400T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-7400T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-9400F is 735 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-7400T.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Performs up to 8% better in Far Cry 3 than Core i5-7400T - 141 vs 131 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7400T - 6 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7400T
- Up to 46% cheaper than Core i5-9400F - $38.03 vs $70.2
- Up to 42% better value when playing Far Cry 3 than Core i5-9400F - $0.32 vs $0.55 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i5-9400F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-9400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Far Cry 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €77.92 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3301 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
131
92%
Value, €/FPS
€0.32/FPS
100%
Price, €
€42.21
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €42.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3301 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-9400F | vs | Intel Core i5-7400T |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
6 | Threads | 4 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |