Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-9400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-9400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13600KF is 1358 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-9400F.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Up to 62% cheaper than Core i5-13600KF - $70.19 vs $182.78
- Up to 54% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-13600KF - $0.59 vs $1.28 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i5-13600KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13600KF
- Performs up to 21% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-9400F - 158 vs 131 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9400F - 20 vs 6 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
131
82%
Value, €/FPS
€0.59/FPS
100%
Price, €
€77.91
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €77.91 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 151 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
158
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.28/FPS
46%
Price, €
€202.89
38%
FPS Winner
Buy for €202.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 151 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-9400F | vs | Intel Core i5-13600KF |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 14 |
6 | Threads | 20 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |