Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-9400F outperforms the more expensive Core i3-6100 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-9400F is 1225 days newer than the more expensive Core i3-6100.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Performs up to 13% better in Immortals of Aveum than Core i3-6100 - 51 vs 45 FPS
- Up to 4% cheaper than Core i3-6100 - $70.2 vs $73.12
- Up to 15% better value when playing Immortals of Aveum than Core i3-6100 - $1.53 vs $1.8 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-6100 - 6 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6100
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i5-9400F - 51 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-9400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
51
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.53/FPS
100%
Price, €
€77.92
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €77.92 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17145 minutes ago
Buy for €81.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17145 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-9400F | vs | Intel Core i3-6100 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
6 | Threads | 4 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 51 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |