Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9400F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-560 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-560 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-9400F is 3054 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-560.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Performs up to 6% better in Rocket League than Core i3-560 - 715 vs 672 FPS
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Core i3-560 - 65 vs 73 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-560 - 6 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-560
- Up to 38% cheaper than Core i5-9400F - $43.86 vs $70.2
- Up to 36% better value when playing Rocket League than Core i5-9400F - $0.07 vs $0.11 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-9400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Rocket League
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Buy for €77.92 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13571 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 29th, 2010
FPS
672
93%
Value, €/FPS
€0.07/FPS
100%
Price, €
€48.69
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €48.69 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13570 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Desktop • Aug 29th, 2010
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-9400F | vs | Intel Core i3-560 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Aug 29th, 2010 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Clarkdale |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
6 | Threads | 4 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 73 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |