Buy on Amazon
€77.92
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9400F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G550 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G550 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-9400F is 2412 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G550.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Performs up to 7% better in HITMAN 3 than Celeron G550 - 200 vs 187 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G550 - 6 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G550
- Up to 49% cheaper than Core i5-9400F - $35.83 vs $70.2
- Up to 46% better value when playing HITMAN 3 than Core i5-9400F - $0.21 vs $0.39 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-9400F doesn't have integrated graphics
HITMAN 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Intel® Core™ i5-9400F Desktop Processor 6 Cores 4.1 GHz Turbo Without Graphics
Buy for €77.92 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18812 minutes ago
Celeron G550
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
FPS
187
93%
Value, €/FPS
€0.21/FPS
100%
Price, €
€39.77
100%
Value Winner
Intel Celeron G550 LGA1155 2.6G 32NM Dual-Core Processor, BX80623G550
Buy for €39.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18811 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-9400F
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Celeron G550
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-9400F | vs | Intel Celeron G550 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Jun 1st, 2012 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
6 | Threads | 2 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
| 4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.