Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9400F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1610 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-9400F is 2227 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Performs up to 52% better in Assassin's Creed Mirage than Celeron G1610 - 100 vs 66 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 6 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 61% cheaper than Core i5-9400F - $27.05 vs $70.2
- Up to 41% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Mirage than Core i5-9400F - $0.46 vs $0.78 per FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i5-9400F - 55 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-9400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Assassin's Creed Mirage
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for €77.92 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14227 minutes ago
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
66
66%
Value, €/FPS
€0.46/FPS
100%
Price, €
€30.03
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €30.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14226 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-9400F | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
6 | Threads | 2 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |