Buy on Amazon
€77.92
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
No items available
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9400F outperforms Celeron 1000M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-9400F is 2179 days newer than Celeron 1000M.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Performs up to 7% better in Death Stranding than Celeron 1000M - 225 vs 211 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 1000M - 6 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron 1000M
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i5-9400F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-9400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Death Stranding
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Core i5-9400F
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
225
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.35/FPS
100%
Price, €
€77.92
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel® Core™ i5-9400F Desktop Processor 6 Cores 4.1 GHz Turbo Without Graphics
Buy for €77.92 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7948 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Core i5-9400F
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Celeron 1000M
Mobile • Jan 20th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-9400F | vs | Intel Celeron 1000M |
|---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 20th, 2013 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket G2 (988B) |
Desktop | Segment | Mobile |
6 | Cores | 2 |
6 | Threads | 2 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 1.8 GHz |
| 4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 65 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.