Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 3800XT outperforms the cheaper Core i5-9400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-9400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 3800XT is 546 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-9400F.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Up to 73% cheaper than Ryzen 7 3800XT - $70.19 vs $255.91
- Up to 72% better value when playing Dead Space than Ryzen 7 3800XT - $0.52 vs $1.84 per FPS
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT - 65 vs 105 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT
- Performs up to 2% better in Dead Space than Core i5-9400F - 154 vs 151 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9400F - 16 vs 6 threads
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
151
98%
Value, €/FPS
€0.52/FPS
100%
Price, €
€77.91
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €77.91 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 48 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
FPS
154
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.84/FPS
28%
Price, €
€284.06
27%
FPS Winner
Buy for €284.06 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 47 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-9400F | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
6 | Threads | 16 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |