Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9400F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 2600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-9400F is 264 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Performs up to 2% better in Elden Ring than Ryzen 5 2600 - 121 vs 119 FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600
- Up to 11% cheaper than Core i5-9400F - $62.7 vs $70.2
- Up to 9% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i5-9400F - $0.58 vs $0.64 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9400F - 12 vs 6 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for €77.92 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13469 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
119
98%
Value, €/FPS
€0.58/FPS
100%
Price, €
€69.6
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €69.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13469 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-9400F | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2600 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
6 | Threads | 12 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |