Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9400F outperforms the more expensive FX-9590 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-9400F is 2037 days newer than the more expensive FX-9590.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Performs up to 8% better in Elden Ring than FX-9590 - 121 vs 112 FPS
- Up to 71% cheaper than FX-9590 - $62.15 vs $217.91
- Consumes up to 70% less energy than AMD FX-9590 - 65 vs 220 Watts
Advantages of AMD FX-9590
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9400F - 8 vs 6 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for €68.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74397 minutes ago
Buy for €241.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74395 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-9400F | vs | AMD FX-9590 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Jun 11th, 2013 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
6 | Threads | 8 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 220 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 23.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |