Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9400F outperforms the cheaper FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6200 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-9400F is 2507 days newer than the cheaper FX-6200.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Performs up to 7% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than FX-6200 - 293 vs 273 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Up to 55% cheaper than Core i5-9400F - $31.32 vs $70.2
- Up to 52% better value when playing PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Core i5-9400F - $0.13 vs $0.27 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-9400F doesn't have integrated graphics
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €77.92 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13744 minutes ago
Buy for €34.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13743 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-9400F | vs | AMD FX-6200 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Feb 27th, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 3 |
6 | Threads | 6 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
No | Overclockable | Yes |