Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-10600KF outperforms the more expensive Core i5-9400 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-10600KF is 559 days newer than the more expensive Core i5-9400.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i5-10600KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600KF
- Performs up to 2% better in Battlefield 1 than Core i5-9400 - 246 vs 242 FPS
- Up to 24% cheaper than Core i5-9400 - $89.94 vs $117.65
- Up to 24% better value when playing Battlefield 1 than Core i5-9400 - $0.41 vs $0.54 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9400 - 12 vs 6 threads
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €130.59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 80 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
246
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.41/FPS
100%
Price, €
€99.83
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €99.83 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 80 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-9400 | vs | Intel Core i5-10600KF |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
6 | Threads | 12 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 41.0x |
UHD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |