Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9400 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3240T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3240T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-9400 is 2237 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3240T.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400
- Performs up to 5% better in ARK: Survival Evolved than Core i3-3240T - 122 vs 116 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3240T - 6 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240T
- Up to 79% cheaper than Core i5-9400 - $18.79 vs $88.42
- Up to 78% better value when playing ARK: Survival Evolved than Core i5-9400 - $0.18 vs $0.8 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i5-9400 - 35 vs 65 Watts
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
122
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.8/FPS
22.499999999999996%
Price, €
€98.15
21%
FPS Winner
Buy for €98.15 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 41 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
116
95.08196721311475%
Value, €/FPS
€0.18/FPS
100%
Price, €
€20.86
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €20.86 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 39 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
447
32.297687861271676%
Multi-Core
971
20.25026068821689%
Intel Core i5-9400 | vs | Intel Core i3-3240T |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
6 | Threads | 4 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
UHD 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |