Buy on Amazon
€99.46
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400F outperforms the more expensive Core i5-8600T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11400F is 1079 days newer than the more expensive Core i5-8600T.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-8600T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i5-11400F - 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400F
- Performs up to 8% better in Battlefield IV than Core i5-8600T - 441 vs 408 FPS
- Up to 14% cheaper than Core i5-8600T - $77.5 vs $89.6
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-8600T - 12 vs 6 threads
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
SIVOYEEL CPU Processor Intel Core I5-8600T I5 8600T 2.3 GHz Six-Core Six-Thread CPU Processor 9M 35W LGA 1151
Buy for €99.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 24 minutes ago
Intel® Core™ i5-11400F Desktop Processor 6 Cores up to 4.4 GHz LGA1200 (Intel® 500 Series & Select 400 Series Chipset) 65W
Buy for €86.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 25 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-8600T
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
Core i5-11400F
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-8600T
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
Single-Core
1259
64.20193778684344%
Multi-Core
4662
61.277602523659304%
Intel Core i5-8600T | vs | Intel Core i5-11400F |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 2nd, 2018 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 6 | Cores | 6 |
| 6 | Threads | 12 |
| 2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
| 3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 23.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.