Buy on Amazon
€99.46
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-8600T outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-8600T is 1946 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-8600T
- Performs up to 14% better in Need For Speed Unbound than Celeron G1610 - 139 vs 122 FPS
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Celeron G1610 - 35 vs 55 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 6 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 70% cheaper than Core i5-8600T - $27.05 vs $89.6
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-8600T doesn't have integrated graphics
Need For Speed Unbound
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
SIVOYEEL CPU Processor Intel Core I5-8600T I5 8600T 2.3 GHz Six-Core Six-Thread CPU Processor 9M 35W LGA 1151
Buy for €99.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 183 minutes ago
Intel Celeron G1610 2.60GHz LGA 1155 Processor BX80637G1610
Buy for €30.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 184 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-8600T
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
426
33.836378077839555%
Multi-Core
739
15.851565851565852%
Intel Core i5-8600T | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 2nd, 2018 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
6 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
| 3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 23.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.