Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-8600K outperforms the more expensive Core i3-10320 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-8600K is 938 days older than the more expensive Core i3-10320.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-8600K
- Performs up to 1% better in Baldur's Gate 3 than Core i3-10320 - 118 vs 117 FPS
- Up to 16% cheaper than Core i3-10320 - $91.4 vs $108.95
- Up to 17% better value when playing Baldur's Gate 3 than Core i3-10320 - $0.86 vs $1.03 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i5-8600K - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-8600K - 8 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-8600K doesn't have integrated graphics
Baldur's Gate 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
FPS
118
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.86/FPS
100%
Price, €
€101.45
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €101.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8 minutes ago
Buy for €120.93 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-8600K | vs | Intel Core i3-10320 |
---|---|---|
Oct 5th, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
6 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |