Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-8400T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-8400T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 759 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-8400T.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-8400T
- Up to 43% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - $101.64 vs $178.41
- Up to 38% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i9-10900F - $0.68 vs $1.09 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900F - 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 8% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i5-8400T - 181 vs 167 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-8400T - 20 vs 6 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
FPS
167
92%
Value, €/FPS
€0.68/FPS
100%
Price, €
€112.82
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €112.82 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 216 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
181
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.09/FPS
62%
Price, €
€198.04
56%
FPS Winner
Buy for €198.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 215 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-8400T | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
---|---|---|
Apr 2nd, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 10 |
6 | Threads | 20 |
1.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
17.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |