Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-10600K outperforms the more expensive Core i5-8400T on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-10600K is 759 days newer than the more expensive Core i5-8400T.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-8400T
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than Intel Core i5-10600K - 35 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600K
- Performs up to 17% better in Starfield than Core i5-8400T - 62 vs 53 FPS
- Up to 2% cheaper than Core i5-8400T - $99.79 vs $101.64
- Up to 16% better value when playing Starfield than Core i5-8400T - $1.79 vs $2.13 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-8400T - 12 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-8400T doesn't have integrated graphics
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
FPS
53
85.48387096774194%
Value, €/FPS
€2.13/FPS
84.03755868544602%
Price, €
€112.82
98%
Buy for €112.82 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6138 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
62
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.79/FPS
100%
Price, €
€110.77
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €110.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6141 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
Single-Core
1099
66.28468033775633%
Multi-Core
3884
56.80023398654578%
Intel Core i5-8400T | vs | Intel Core i5-10600K |
---|---|---|
Apr 2nd, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
6 | Threads | 12 |
1.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
17.0x | Multiplier | 41.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |