Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-8400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-8400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9900K is 379 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-8400.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-8400
- Up to 71% cheaper than Core i9-9900K - $83.35 vs $291.75
- Up to 69% better value when playing Rust than Core i9-9900K - $0.48 vs $1.56 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900K - 65 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900K
- Performs up to 7% better in Rust than Core i5-8400 - 207 vs 193 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-8400 - 16 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-8400 doesn't have integrated graphics
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
FPS
193
93%
Value, €/FPS
€0.48/FPS
100%
Price, €
€92.52
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €92.52 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 82 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
207
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.56/FPS
30%
Price, €
€323.84
28%
FPS Winner
Buy for €323.84 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 82 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-8400 | vs | Intel Core i9-9900K |
---|---|---|
Oct 5th, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
6 | Threads | 16 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |