Buy on Amazon
€90.9
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-8400 outperforms the cheaper Core i7-3770S on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-3770S is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-8400 is 1985 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-3770S.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-8400
- Performs up to 4% better in Deathloop than Core i7-3770S - 177 vs 170 FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770S
- Up to 19% cheaper than Core i5-8400 - $66.54 vs $81.89
- Up to 16% better value when playing Deathloop than Core i5-8400 - $0.43 vs $0.51 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-8400 - 8 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-8400 doesn't have integrated graphics
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-8400
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
FPS
177
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.51/FPS
84.31372549019608%
Price, €
€90.9
81%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i5-8400 Desktop Processor 6 Cores up to 4.0 GHz LGA 1151 300 Series 65W
Buy for €90.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5296 minutes ago
Core i7-3770S
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
170
96.045197740113%
Value, €/FPS
€0.43/FPS
100%
Price, €
€73.86
100%
Value Winner
Intel Core i7-3770S Quad-Core Processor 3.1 GHz 8 MB Cache LGA 1155 - BX80637I73770S
Buy for €73.86 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5291 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-8400
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Core i7-3770S
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-3770S
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Single-Core
669
49.44567627494457%
Multi-Core
2234
47.051390058972196%
Intel Core i5-8400 | vs | Intel Core i7-3770S |
|---|---|---|
Oct 5th, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
| 6 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
| 65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 28.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4000 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.