Buy on Amazon
€106.1
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-8400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-8400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700KF is 938 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-8400.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-8400
- Up to 37% cheaper than Core i7-10700KF - $95.59 vs $152.81
- Up to 34% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i7-10700KF - $0.82 vs $1.24 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700KF
- Performs up to 5% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-8400 - 137 vs 130 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-8400 - 16 vs 6 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Core i5-8400
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
FPS
130
94%
Value, €/FPS
€0.82/FPS
100%
Price, €
€106.1
100%
Value Winner
Intel Core i5-8400 Desktop Processor 6 Cores up to 4.0 GHz LGA 1151 300 Series 65W
Buy for €106.1 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12128 minutes ago
Core i7-10700KF
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
137
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.24/FPS
66%
Price, €
€169.62
62%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i7-10700KF Desktop Processor 8 Cores up to 5.1 GHz Unlocked Without Processor Graphics LGA1200 (Intel 400 Series chipset) 125W
Buy for €169.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12128 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Core i5-8400
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Core i7-10700KF
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-8400 | vs | Intel Core i7-10700KF |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 5th, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 6 | Cores | 8 |
| 6 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 28.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.