Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-11600KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-8400 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-11600KF is 1258 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-8400.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-8400
- Up to 25% cheaper than Core i5-11600KF - $81.89 vs $109.68
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600KF
- Performs up to 69% better in League of Legends than Core i5-8400 - 267 vs 158 FPS
- Up to 21% better value when playing League of Legends than Core i5-8400 - $0.46 vs $0.58 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-8400 - 12 vs 6 threads
League of Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
FPS
158
59.176029962546814%
Value, €/FPS
€0.58/FPS
79.31034482758622%
Price, €
€90.9
100%
Buy for €90.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5665 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
267
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.46/FPS
100%
Price, €
€121.75
74%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €121.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5668 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Single-Core
1353
61.612021857923494%
Multi-Core
4748
54.53083725737912%
Intel Core i5-8400 | vs | Intel Core i5-11600KF |
---|---|---|
Oct 5th, 2017 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
6 | Threads | 12 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |