Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-10320 outperforms Core i5-8400 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-10320 is 938 days newer than Core i5-8400.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Performs up to 4% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i5-8400 - 575 vs 552 FPS
- Up to 6% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i5-8400 - $0.17 vs $0.18 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-8400 - 8 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-8400 doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €97.4 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 106 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
575
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.17/FPS
100%
Price, €
€97.4
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €97.4 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 104 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-8400 | vs | Intel Core i3-10320 |
---|---|---|
Oct 5th, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
6 | Threads | 8 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |