Key Differences
In short — Core i5-8400 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-8400 is 275 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-8400
- Performs up to 39% better in F1 23 than Celeron G3930T - 216 vs 155 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 6 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Up to 83% cheaper than Core i5-8400 - $14.61 vs $84.08
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i5-8400 - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-8400 doesn't have integrated graphics
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for €93.33 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 91 minutes ago
Buy for €16.22 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 89 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
548
40.502586844050256%
Multi-Core
948
19.96630160067397%
Intel Core i5-8400 | vs | Intel Celeron G3930T |
---|---|---|
Oct 5th, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
6 | Threads | 2 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |