Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-11600KF outperforms the more expensive Core i5-7640X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-11600KF is 1359 days newer than the more expensive Core i5-7640X.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7640X
- Consumes up to 10% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600KF - 112 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600KF
- Performs up to 2% better in Battlefield 1 than Core i5-7640X - 253 vs 247 FPS
- Up to 56% cheaper than Core i5-7640X - $109.68 vs $249.08
- Up to 57% better value when playing Battlefield 1 than Core i5-7640X - $0.48 vs $1.12 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7640X - 12 vs 4 threads
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
FPS
247
97.62845849802372%
Value, €/FPS
€1.12/FPS
42.85714285714285%
Price, €
€276.48
44%
Buy for €276.48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3855 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
253
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.48/FPS
100%
Price, €
€121.75
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €121.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3859 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
Single-Core
1761
80.19125683060109%
Multi-Core
5275
60.58343861261054%
Intel Core i5-7640X | vs | Intel Core i5-11600KF |
---|---|---|
Jun 26th, 2017 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
112 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |