Buy on Amazon
€42.21
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-7600T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-7600T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10400F is 1213 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-7600T.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7600T
- Up to 48% cheaper than Core i5-10400F - $38.03 vs $73.09
- Up to 45% better value when playing Rocket League than Core i5-10400F - $0.06 vs $0.11 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i5-10400F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Performs up to 2% better in Rocket League than Core i5-7600T - 718 vs 707 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7600T - 12 vs 4 threads
Rocket League
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Core i5-7600T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
707
98%
Value, €/FPS
€0.06/FPS
100%
Price, €
€42.21
100%
Value Winner
Intel BX80677I57600T 7th Generation Core i5-7600T Processor
Buy for €42.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15316 minutes ago
Core i5-10400F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
718
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.11/FPS
54%
Price, €
€81.13
52%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i5-10400F (Base Clock: 2.90 GHz; Socket: LGA1200; 65 Watt) Box
Buy for €81.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15315 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Core i5-7600T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Core i5-10400F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-7600T | vs | Intel Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Kaby Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
| 4 | Threads | 12 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| 3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 28.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.