Key Differences
In short — Core i5-7600K outperforms the cheaper FX-4300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-7600K is 1533 days newer than the cheaper FX-4300.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7600K
- Performs up to 17% better in Lost Ark than FX-4300 - 261 vs 223 FPS
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than AMD FX-4300 - 91 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-4300
- Up to 36% cheaper than Core i5-7600K - $35.11 vs $54.84
- Up to 26% better value when playing Lost Ark than Core i5-7600K - $0.17 vs $0.23 per FPS
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
261
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.23/FPS
73.91304347826087%
Price, €
€60.87
64%
FPS Winner
Buy for €60.87 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 85 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
223
85.44061302681992%
Value, €/FPS
€0.17/FPS
100%
Price, €
€38.97
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €38.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 82 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-7600K | vs | AMD FX-4300 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
91 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |