Key Differences
In short — Core i5-7600 outperforms the more expensive Core i3-4160 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4160 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-7600 is 897 days newer than the more expensive Core i3-4160.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7600
- Performs up to 6% better in World of Warcraft than Core i3-4160 - 182 vs 172 FPS
- Up to 62% cheaper than Core i3-4160 - $70.17 vs $185.81
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4160
- Up to 79% better value when playing World of Warcraft than Core i5-7600 - $0.09 vs $0.43 per FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Core i5-7600 - 54 vs 65 Watts
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
182
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.43/FPS
20.930232558139533%
Price, €
€77.89
100%
FPS Winner
Buy for €77.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
FPS
172
94.5054945054945%
Value, €/FPS
€0.09/FPS
100%
Price, €
€206.25
37%
Value Winner
Buy for €206.25 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 57 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Single-Core
1064
77.49453750910416%
Multi-Core
2072
54.35466946484785%
Intel Core i5-7600 | vs | Intel Core i3-4160 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2014 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 54 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
No | Overclockable | No |