Key Differences
In short — Core i5-760 outperforms the cheaper Pentium G6950 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G6950 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-760 is 192 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G6950.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-760
- Performs up to 3% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Pentium G6950 - 444 vs 429 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G6950 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium G6950
- Up to 57% cheaper than Core i5-760 - $27.73 vs $64.5
- Up to 56% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i5-760 - $0.07 vs $0.16 per FPS
- Consumes up to 23% less energy than Intel Core i5-760 - 73 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-760 doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 18th, 2010
FPS
444
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.16/FPS
43.75000000000001%
Price, €
€71.59
42%
FPS Winner
Buy for €71.59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 169 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
FPS
429
96.62162162162163%
Value, €/FPS
€0.07/FPS
100%
Price, €
€30.78
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €30.78 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 168 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 18th, 2010
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-760 | vs | Intel Pentium G6950 |
---|---|---|
Jul 18th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 7th, 2010 |
Core i5 | Collection | Pentium |
Lynnfield | Codename | Clarkdale |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 73 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |