Key Differences
In short — Pentium G4400 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-760 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-760 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Pentium G4400 is 1871 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-760.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-760
- Up to 7% cheaper than Pentium G4400 - $64.5 vs $69.68
- Up to 4% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Pentium G4400 - $0.46 vs $0.48 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G4400 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium G4400
- Performs up to 3% better in No Man's Sky than Core i5-760 - 161 vs 157 FPS
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than Intel Core i5-760 - 54 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-760 doesn't have integrated graphics
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 18th, 2010
FPS
157
97.51552795031056%
Value, €/FPS
€0.46/FPS
100%
Price, €
€71.59
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €71.59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3728 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
161
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.48/FPS
95.83333333333334%
Price, €
€77.35
92%
FPS Winner
Buy for €77.35 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3732 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 18th, 2010
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-760 | vs | Intel Pentium G4400 |
---|---|---|
Jul 18th, 2010 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i5 | Collection | Pentium |
Lynnfield | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 54 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
No | Overclockable | No |